The Aztecs
Military Analysis
The Barracks
The Aztecs receive every Barracks unit aside from the
Halberdier upgrade. Lacking Cavalry, and having a Unique Technology that
benefits all Barracks units, expect to see a lot of infantry from an Aztec
player.
The Archery
The Aztecs get Arbalests and Elite Skirmishers, but
since they get no mounted or gunpowder units, they are missing Cavalry Archers
and Hand Cannoneers. They are missing a few critical archer upgrades as well -
Thumb Ring and Ring Archer Armor. Nowhere near as good with archery as their
Meso-American brothers, and with their ability to counter infantry with
infantry, the only unit that should see action here is the Elite Skirmisher,
but even that will not see quite as much action, since Eagle Warriors also
counter archers.
The Stable
Just like the Mayans, the Aztecs cannot even build a
stable. Is this a problem? Not likely, as the Aztecs have many other weapons
they can use.
The Siege Workshop
The Aztecs have a decent Siege Workshop, with the full
line of rams and onagers, only lacking the Heavy Scorpion and Bombard Cannon.
Having Siege Onagers allows the Aztecs to effectively counter archers and other
siege weapons and should be researched against civilizations using either of
the above. Having Siege Rams makes rams + infantry a very enticing option for
leveling towns.
The Monastery
The only thing missing from the Aztec Monastery is the
Missionary, but who needs that when the Aztecs have super Monks? If the Aztec
player is going heavy on Monks, then all the cheap technologies will probably
be researched to add hit points, with only the prohibitively expensive
technologies being left untouched. 5 hit points can go a long way, especially
when it is cumulative. Spending gold on Monastery technologies is even easier
with the lack of gold-intensive cavalry to waste gold on.
The Dock
The dock is by far the Aztecs' weakest point, since
they are the only civilization to lack the Galleon. The only Imperial Age ship
they have access to be the Fast Fire Ship, which while having its uses at
times, is generally a waste of time to build. At all costs an Aztec player
should avoid playing on water (or equally, a water player should avoid playing
Aztecs). Unless the sea is taken early, it will be next to impossible for the
Aztec to gain control in the later game. They do have access to Dry Dock and
Careening, which means that their transports will be fairly effective in
launching surprise landings, or in evacuating to an ally's town in island games
once the enemy has surrounded their island with superior ships.
Technology Analysis
The Aztecs, like the Mayans, are fairly lacking in the
technology department, which means that what they do have is fairly important
to have researched.
Economic Technologies
Economically the Aztecs aren't missing much, and
coupled with their +5 carrying capacity, this allows them to collect resources
more efficiently than most other civilizations. The only technologies they are
missing are Guilds and Two-Man Saw. Neither is extremely important, but Guilds
can be nice to have at times.
Military Technologies
Besides missing every cavalry technology there is, the
Aztecs also manage to lack the upgrades for some of the more important ranged
units, as previously mentioned. Add on top of this their very poor ship line,
and you see how they are balanced with the other civilizations, considering
they have such a strong infantry line.
They miss out on Masonry and Architecture, two
semi-important technologies that usually aren't researched by most players.
These technologies do make a difference however, as Aztec buildings won't stand
up as long as those of other civilizations which have these technologies.
The Aztecs' wooden buildings won't be the only things
falling, as they also miss out on hoardings, allowing their castles to fall
more quickly than other civilizations' castles which do have this technology.
This is not too critical most of the time - when the enemy has six trebuchets
firing on your castle it is doomed anyway - but in certain situations, those
extra hit points can turn a game.
Comments:
|
19.12.06 19:51 -
Narse |
|
a couple of things u didn't say: aztec pikemen do more damage than other civ's halbediers, elite eagle warriors have a nice anti-arrow armor so they're a good choice agaist archers (maybe better than skirmishers as they have the +4 damage from garland wars), aztec champions should make a castle tremble. |
|
02.02.07 19:32 -
Staso |
|
Very nice tutorial |
|
25.03.07 14:22 -
HN_Devang_ |
|
@ Narse
The attack of Aztec pikes though more than Halberdiers,the attack bonus of Halberdiers is Greater than Pikes |
|
07.04.07 01:43 -
cho ko nu |
|
i love garland wars! |
|
03.05.07 12:09 -
Wilbur |
|
One bad thing about Aztecs (and Mayans) is that if they lose their Eagle Warrior they have to wait until the Castle Age to replace it, whereas others can get more Scout Cavalry in the Feudal Age. |
|
24.05.07 22:24 -
Kippy |
|
I think Teutons, with their resistance to conversion, and with more powerful infantry(UU) can beat the crap out of aztecs, even with Jaguar warriors |
|
18.06.07 22:32 -
Bob McBob |
|
Kippy, Teutons don't have a better infantry. Can THEIR infantry have up to 22 attack? And can they field monks that have 90 HIT?
Really good turorial, AZTECS FTW!!! |
|
14.07.07 03:11 -
|
|
ya and btw jags have bonus vs infantry lol |
|
17.07.07 20:35 -
san |
|
they need to wait unitl castle age, thats a balance of the game because an eagle can kill a scout, is faster, and is cheaper than a scout at that time of the game |
|
20.07.07 20:49 -
Someome |
|
But wouldn't a cavilrer/paladin more or less counter any damage the aztec infantry (although they (cavalry) are more expensive to make) could make? Also the cavalry's speed makes them be able to come faster to annoying trebuchets or a general attack. |
|
23.08.07 16:35 -
rivaan |
|
Nice article will be very useful i guess!!!! |
|
10.10.07 21:15 -
rambabu |
|
What narse said is true aztec pikes are powerful than some civ halbs |
|
14.10.07 03:40 -
person |
|
thought pikemans hit more they are useless against anything but cavalry and since the attk bonus is still less it is quit useless |
|
14.10.07 16:13 -
gdrgew |
|
you should do this wit every civ |
|
26.11.07 00:00 -
FeHuLaika |
|
if youre up against an aztec or a mayan player byzatines would be a very good choise. the cataphract has a huge bonus against infantery, takes down fully upgraded teutonc knights like it was deers. against mayans you should have som paladins to. |
|
13.12.07 02:15 -
Lord MacDonald |
|
The Teutons and the Aztecs are obviously very evenly matched. 1 vs 1, an elite Teutonic Knight kills an elite Jagaur Warrior only because the knight has way more armor and has a hefty attack. |
|
24.06.08 22:47 -
AOE FREAK |
|
1v1 if fully upgraded, the first one to strike wins. Tutonic knights have higher hp and their aromer takes away the bonus. |
|
24.06.08 22:52 -
AOE FREAK |
|
i also forgot to say, jag warriors are 13+8 attack (21) |
|
29.11.08 19:50 -
|
|
Nope, they are 12+8 = 20 attack. You're thinking of champions.
Nevertheless, Aztec Infantry are pretty much pygmy war elephants. |
|
11.01.09 15:22 -
19.12.2008 - fuck off |
|
nice |
|
23.02.09 18:33 -
bilbi |
|
well done |
|
15.04.09 17:01 -
bitch |
|
poopy poo |
|
04.06.09 23:06 -
AOE KINNY KIN KING KINNY |
|
I was a total noob before finding this site. After I had found it, I turned into KINNY KIN KING KINNY of AOE! Not really, I turned into a bigger noob. |
|
03.07.09 22:07 -
Templar |
|
pikemen may have good attack with garland wars(4+8), but they have less hp and armor so ranged units are dangerous for them, also cataphracts can devastate aztecs in castle age and early imperial age. only in post imperial age they can barely counter cataphracts by using siege onagers and monks. |
|
09.07.09 22:52 -
Indigo |
|
i've had a fully upgraded Teutonic Knight go up against a fully upgraded cataphract and win to take out another |
|
25.07.09 07:56 -
aliah |
|
Aztecs are pretty shit i rekon.Their navy is hopeless, no cav, avo archers and they don't get stronger infantry until the imperial age.The japanese infantry is alot better cos the attack speed is through the whole game.The only decent thng about aztecs is their monks which are expensive |
|
26.08.09 12:41 -
4701 |
|
Aztec has Loom free in 1.0c, which makes it possible to get 5 militia before anyone reaches feudal! Aztec drush rocks. |
|
07.02.10 16:06 -
satvik |
|
Ajtecs are hopeless against byzantines
|
|
15.02.10 10:15 -
turtle ship |
|
Yeah, but remember that Byazantine's main power to beat Aztec infantry is their cataphract & since cataphract is pretty expensive, you should be able to beat them by outnumbering them with pikemen since Aztec has good economy & military creation speed bonus, plus pikemen is very cheap and with garland war, they're even stronger than other civ halberdier in term of attack damage they could deal |
|
06.03.10 14:54 -
turtle ship |
|
Also, because cataphract has pretty low pierce armor & has no attack against archer, building a large number of arbalest to counter cataphract is a good idea |
|
30.04.10 14:56 -
I <3 aztecs |
|
:) thx, i always choose aztexs but i didn't knew the bonus of monks |
|
02.07.10 09:11 -
gccnmvmk |
|
Everyone lose their time with Aztecs, Aztecs have bad archers, worse ships in all game,(they don't even have the first demolision ship and galleons). No masonry and architecture, Aztecs are only good in infantery but that's nothing comparate to the cavalry and gunpower of other civs, I know Aztecs have Eagle Warriors but they have too little hp.(Only 60!). Aztec pikmen are not as mighty as people see them.
Aztec pikeman:
4+8=12
Halberdier(Random civ):
6+4=10
Is not a grand difference.
Aztec monks attack?
Hersey
No hersey?
Light scout or Hussar(They have resistance to monk convertion and attack bonus against monks).
Conclusion:
Aztecs are a barely useless civ against other civs. |
|
18.07.10 10:13 -
gccnmvmk |
|
I think it's nice that the creators of this guide are trying to discover strength in the Aztecs, but I don't think that the Aztecs, the AOE civ with WORST archers, ships, and buildings in all game(check tech trees if someone don't believe me) will be able to fight well other civs. I make a test, a post-imperial japanese samurai vs post-imperial aztec jag warrior, and the samurai won! Aztecs have good Champions and Monks anyway.(Jaguar warriors too if fighting infantery) |
|
08.08.10 00:35 -
Sasori |
|
SHUT UP AZTECS OWN TEUTONS EASY IF TEUTONS BRING PALADINS MASSED PIKES WILL KILL THEM IF THEY GET TEUTONIC KNIGHTS JAGS WILL KILL THEM IF ONAGERS EAGLES WILL KILL THEM IF BOMBARD TOWER TREBS WILL KILL THEM |
|
08.08.10 00:37 -
sasori |
|
hey bitch your a sick ass fucker stop saying bad things ok its not nice |